|
Music quality...
Link |
by
 
on 2011-03-22 12:22:25 |
|
A question about music quality. Is a 210kbps better than a 210 converted into a 320kbps? I know that a 320kbps is certainly better than one converted to it. However, I do not know how much of a difference it makes. In terms of file size and quality, what are your opinions? Note: I always leave the files untouched because changing it would affect it... in a way which I can't really describe... 
  |
|
Re: Music quality...
Link |
by
on 2011-03-22 12:27:36 |
Converting a 210kbps audio file into 320kbps does not increase the sound quality, only the file size. 
|
|
Re: Music quality...
Link |
by
on 2011-03-22 12:42:56 |
|
Ohh... I see. Thanks. But I'm wondering... if it did not increase the sound quality, and only increased the file size... Why do I still see some people doing that @.@ Is it because of some misconceptions? Hmm.. does it improve anything at all??
|
|
Re: Music quality...
Link |
by
on 2011-03-22 18:53:51 |
|
Like Gendou said, it doesn't improve anything but the file size. It's different than making an old photo look brand new in Photoshop. Music is completely different. 
------- |
|
Re: Music quality...
Link |
by
on 2011-03-22 20:32:32 |
|
If people do it, they do so because they don't know any better.
|
|
Re: Music quality...
Link |
by
on 2011-03-22 23:35:59 |
|
@DA I see... @Gendou El-oh-el. Okay.
|