|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
Link |
by
on 2005-12-19 08:11:38 |
It may be portrayed that way however it is not. Do a search see what pops up.  |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
|
You must have reading comprehension difficulties, because when someone says that "A is portrayed as such, while A is actually B". It means that the first statement is false, in this case, I was pointing out that the U.S, though commonly portrayed to have loose morals, is in fact very concerned about morality. Thus, my statement "most of our time spent is actually argueing over morality and its derivations". So, yeah, I'm not sure why you said that, because you either did not read my whole post, or you reading comprehension issues.
"Death destroys a man, the idea of death saves him." E.M Forster
|
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
Link |
by SpiritFightZ
on 2005-12-19 20:41:37
|
|
not sure exactly if it really called free sex but people tends to share their experience on the net (with videos some more with opposite sex) and giving away the address to others.
Do wad u think is right, accept your past..............
|
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
|
("-_-)=0(#)'3')Is sex bad? It depends on your perspective, like this one: basically, on sex means no humans on earth-people would be extinct because no reproduction. But, if u look at it this way: if people takes advantage of sex in a 'certain' manner.......than you can say sex is bad.(>_<)
("-_-)=0(#)'3')
I'm so werid (^_^)
(>_<)
Feel the wrath of my feet!
|
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
Link |
by AnimeAngel27
on 2005-12-20 19:41:31
|
|
Hmm sex has it's good and it's bad like just about everything else in this world. I mean without it you and I wouldn't be here, actually no one would be here unless we all had magic and created ourselves from dirt or something(which of course is logically impssible, but it's always nice to daydream...lol) But some people don't use it for that and that's when it becomes "bad" persay. It's supposed to be about love and sharing love to create something beautiful from two people's love (hence a baby, because babies are the symbols of their parents love (in most casses at least)) But others just do it to do it cause it's "cool" and what not... It's all how you look at it "Sex is bad, don't have sex cause you'll get pregnant, and die!" "Sex is bad, don't have sex because you'll get an STD, and die! Here take a rubber, just in case, but don't have sex!" From the Movie Mean Girls (I just threw that in there for comedy it's not there to sway anyone's opinions, just to bring a little chuckle)
"Everyone has a photographic memory, some just don't have any film..." "Friends are the people who know everything about you and still put up with you!" "Nothing in life is free, even death costs us."
|
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
Link |
by animezsuki
on 2005-12-21 04:21:34 |
| its the most wonderful thing on earth! if use wrongly then its bad |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
|
The relative judgment of an action is directed by two stipulations; these being motive and outcome. By the way, it is not "persay" but rather "per se", because it is not an english word, it is not written with the english word "say".
"Death destroys a man, the idea of death saves him." E.M Forster
|
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
Link |
by overlordsero
on 2005-12-21 13:18:06
|
|
Sex is a wonderful thing....to be shared with the one you love.... However since humans are involved with sex, it can be used for other ways and hence be deemed "bad" anyways thats what I have to say right now....kinda came to me...wells *Breathe in breathe out, breathe in breathe out.....sign here and here and here....Thanks for selling your soul!* 
|
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
Link |
by
on 2005-12-21 16:13:22 |
|
The relative judgment of an action is directed by two stipulations; these being motive and outcome? I disagree. If it is then it's motive and desire. We already know what the coutcome is going to be. |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
Link |
by
on 2005-12-25 05:35:15 |
|
Eric, I don't believe you actually asked that question. Of course we love sex. As far as I know everyone loves sex. |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
| If sex is bad, all our parents, and yes us too would be considered very~~~BAD~~~people~~~ ^_^" |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
Link |
by OwdEe sh4H
on 2005-12-26 05:54:02
|
eric,u're still young,aren't u?hahahaa..what kind of question is that?^_^   |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
Link |
by
on 2005-12-26 06:15:13 |
|
Yes Sensei, bad parents, bad, bad parents having sex in the next room. Lots of sex with children nearby. Forshame they should learn about sex from their parents. That is a problem; too many parents don't talk to their chidren so about the act itself, creating children, making love, doing IT. They leave it to the schools who only talk about the biological aspects and using protection to avoid STD's. The don't talk about eroticism which is what happens when you both start kissing and playing touchy feely. They don't tell you about the "other" parts (the bumpy bits) of the body that react when you touch them and I'm not referring to the genitals, (the naughty bits?????) :) :) :) We have a single mother here whose girls are 15 and 17. They know less about sex than I did when I was 20 and I knew virtually nothing. About all I knew was what I had heard from other girls at school and that you could get pregnant. Mu told me these girls didn't even know that until she told them. They were also told that touching themselves was a sin. How does that work? |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
|
For married couples its a sign of make children For does Gigalos and prostitutes =aids aides and HIV |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
| Nice Bumpy bits... |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
|
"The relative judgment of an action is directed by two stipulations; these being motive and outcome? I disagree. If it is then it's motive and desire. We already know what the coutcome is going to be." Well, then I have to disagree with you. When judging an action, the desire for the outcome is part of motive. Your motive in initiating the action is important to philosophers such as Kant(not that I necessarily ascribe to his philosophy, but I am citing him as an example because he believes in judging an action solely by motive, which is where I disagree). No, actually we do not necessarily know what the outcome will be. If we knew the outcome of every action, there would be no uncertainty in the world. And, it is impossible to weigh all indirectly affected outcomes. Furthermore, we as humans do not really know any outcome for certain. It can't be absolute, and thus we perceive infintesmally high percentages as a truth. You load a gun, you pull the trigger. You assume the gun is going to fire, because it does so often. But it jams and does not fire. In this case, a gun jamming is actually a lot more likely than most things in life. Besides the proof that outcome is unknown, it can further be argued that is necessary in judging and action. Say a bus is driving down the road, and a man is planning on pushing someone in its path. Accidentally, he actually pushes him out of the way because he was going to get hit. So he saved the man, but it was not what he had intended to do. His motive for the action, the push, was completely wrong. But the outcome was good. So which takes precedent in judging an action? Well, philosophers disagree. Utilitarian philosophers such as Mills believe that the outcome of an action is what is necessary to judge it, while I already explained the Kantian perspective. I believe in achieving a balance between the two. In my opinion, it is most likely that this person would be lauded as a hero and that he would not reveal his original intentions. If he has a shred of humanity, he may regret his earlier ideas. But if he feels guilty and does not give away his secret, he will be tormented in his soul. Unless he is a pycopath, in which case he would not really give a damn. However, in this twisted example, he could not be given a severe punishment by law even if he turned himself in, other than intent to harm, reckless endangerment or something. O.k., back to the sex application. I assume that's where you coming from when you said desire. Desire, such as instinct, to perform some action is a motive to perform said action. So it follows that it makes no sense to say motive and desire, as desire is a sub topic of motive. Alright, so now let us apply my philosophy to this situation. Only one problem: not all sexual situations are the same. There is the legal, the illegal, the responsible, and the irresponsible, with some crossover between some of the categories. So if your motive is good, and the outcome is good, than it is good. If your motive is bad, the outcome will always inevitably be worse than had your motive been good. Also, a bad intention is much more likely to create a bad outcome for people other than yourself, and many times, including yourself. If you had good motive, and poor outcome, and gave it all you had, then it is external interference,intentional or unintentional, that skewed your results. Or in the case of people, the receptor of your action was not happy to receive, despite good intentions. Yes, well, I think those are pretty much as vague stipulations it can be put in. With this set of situational evaluation techniques, you have a system to evaluate almost every action. Of course you need additional skills and tools to do so, but that's not my problem. I'm merely pointing out the foolishness of all of you.
"Death destroys a man, the idea of death saves him." E.M Forster
|
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
|
Is sex bad? Haha, here's a simple answer "hell no" It's what makes people feel good about themselves and about eachother. There are many questions about the badness of sex. Sex leads to a lot of things such as love and pain. But as people, we don't want to THINK that sex is bad. Think positive, sex is GOOD, haha we're in the millenium god dam it :D |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
|
sex can be good or it can kill you i'm young and i have had sex i'm not maried yet and i'm lucky that nothing hapened my advice to you and all others dont have sex till your maried
Death is not bad.
The fear of it and lack of preperation is.
|
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
|
Who the heck put up such a stoopid question? The human race would be depleted if not for reproduction. It's a natural thing, there's not bad or good to it. It is what it is. How humans portray it is another thing that should be left to interpretation. |
|
Re: Is Sex bad?!
|
|
Well, it may all depend by what situation you're in. If you're married and what-not it's normal to have sex. If you're young and not married, it's not bad but it's frowned upon. You get what I'm saying? It's like... in the manner of which you do it. If you just sleep around with anybody you meet, it's very dangerous. You could get all sorts of crap that mess up your body. I don't think it's bad, I just think you should be very careful when you have it.
Mimiko~
"... I called your boyfriend gay and he hit me with his purse..."
|